Discussion about this post

User's avatar
vao's avatar

His books have been on my reading list for a while. Peak oil is so unfashionable now, I don't think many grasp that the end is written in stone. Jim likes to ask which if the straining structures will break first but they are all faces of the same thing; the economics depends on the physics and the violence (including the risk of nuclear conflagration) springs naturally from the strain produced there..

Paul wrote in a comment (on the last of his own articles) that he takes heart from the fact that the AI prison world cannot truly come into being as envisioned. There's so much of that ilk we can let go of. Technocracy is shit, no doubt, but it's also so dumb it's comical. This is what I meant when I suggested we focus on what is physically possible. A world made by hand is, while a world made by robots is not.

I find Jim somewhat limited by his political imagination but it's a consoling vision nonetheless (aside from the billions who have to die!)

Expand full comment
Peter d'Errico's avatar

you do a good job explicating these books and ideas... thanks

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts